Ralph Reed: Preventing Gay Marriage A Winning Issue For Republicans
Ignoring that a growing number of voters, and especially younger ones, aren’t opposed to gay marriage, Ralph Reed sees opposition to marriage equality as a winning position for the Republican Party.
During an interview with Bloomberg TV over the weekend, host Al Hunt asked Reed if evangelical Christians would reject any candidate who supported same-sex marriage.
“That’s the position that we take,” Reed declared. “If you poll Republican primary voters, 75 to 80 percent of them are in support of traditional marriage.”
Reed argued that every prospective 2016 GOP presidential candidate was “pro-life, pro-family and pro-marriage.”
Hunt, however, pointed out that young voters were “overwhelmingly pro-same-sex marriage.”
“They are,” Reed admitted. “But a lot of the people, who in the 60s and 70s were protesting the Vietnam war, and for legalizing drugs, were voting for Ronald Reagan in 1980 and ’84. People change.”
“So you think same-sex marriage — the opposition to same-sex marriage, the support for traditional marriage — may actually be a plus for Republicans?” Hunt wondered.
“It’s definitely a winner,” Reed insisted. “And it’s a winner in ways that surprise a lot of people. Remember, Al, when California voters voted on this issue in 2008, all the polling showed that it was going to win overwhelmingly.”
HKAnders June 23rd, 2014 at 7:44 am
Reed is delusional, but I hope his party listens to him. It will be thirty years before they win another presidential election, if ever.
William June 23rd, 2014 at 8:24 am
Ralph Reed sees opposition to marriage equality as a winning position for the Republican Party..
That and trickle down economics. Hey Ralph, looks like you have a winner there. I say go with it.
dr_benton_quest June 23rd, 2014 at 8:52 am
I wonder if self-loathing and denial are his driving motivations?
Shades June 23rd, 2014 at 8:53 am
Yeah, good luck with that.
pfair143 June 23rd, 2014 at 10:46 am
Can it be a “winning” issue if you have already lost it?
labman57 June 23rd, 2014 at 11:47 am
Another social conservative who refuses to let reality undermine his nonsensical rhetoric.