September 23, 2014 7:07 pm -

[su_right_ad]Louisiana Senator David Vitter says President Obama is lying about the threat posed by the Khorasan Group to help Democrats in the midterm election. Vitter spoke to Newsmax’s J. D. Hayworth.

“Are you afraid the administration cries wolf once too often in these situations?” Hayworth asked.

“Yes, particularly right before an election,” Vitter responded.

Later in the interview, Vitter claimed that the administration is offering public benefits to undocumented immigrants in order to “increase illegal flow into the United States with the eventual goal of making them citizens and voters and everything else.”


D.B. Hirsch
D.B. Hirsch is a political activist, news junkie, and retired ad copy writer and spin doctor. He lives in Brooklyn, New York.

32 responses to Republican Senator Says Obama Lying About Terror Threat To Help Democrats

  1. Obewon September 23rd, 2014 at 7:14 pm

    Louisiana Sen Vitter is lying about D.C. Hookers again! Trying to divert from BenGhazi.

    • Anomaly 100 September 23rd, 2014 at 7:27 pm

      And diapers!

      • William September 23rd, 2014 at 10:02 pm

        and not just ANY diapers.

  2. StoneyCurtisll September 23rd, 2014 at 7:17 pm

    Look where David Vitter goes to spout his nonsense…
    Freakin Newsmax~!!!
    He couldn’t find one of his prostitutes to be a spokesperson for him?

    • Obewon September 23rd, 2014 at 7:22 pm

      Newsmax because the far more reputable prostitutes only interview Diapers Vitter in an oversized baby crib.

  3. neworleans878 September 23rd, 2014 at 7:20 pm

    Hey David…your hookers called and said they got your diapers waiting…

    ps…not all Louisiana women are like Wendy Vitter or Kelly McAlister…most would never be a prop for their husband’s political aspirations…I know my wife never would, and I sure as hell respect her for that…

  4. Linda1961 September 23rd, 2014 at 7:21 pm

    Hey y’all! It’s Diaper Dave giving us his turds of stupidity again.

  5. Maxx44 September 23rd, 2014 at 7:38 pm

    Oh, I get it. Obama talked those thousands of people murdered by ISIS into sacrificing themselves to boost the Dem’s chances in November.

  6. tiredoftea September 23rd, 2014 at 7:50 pm

    The very definition of willful ignorance is bliss.

  7. lynchie September 23rd, 2014 at 7:51 pm

    He must have gotten his diaper in a knot. I am so tired of calling our President a liar when the very people levelling the charge are admitted adulterers, felons and the clinically insane.

  8. lynchie September 23rd, 2014 at 7:52 pm

    I think he is pissed because Obama might be using the same tactics GW used to go into Iraq.

  9. Bunya September 23rd, 2014 at 7:57 pm

    I can’t believe the diaperman has the cajoles to go out in public, calling attention to himself. Does this sanctimonious, self righteous, morally superior “family values” advocate not see that his weird sexual fetishes have made him a universal laughing stock? Is he not even the slightest bit embarrassed? Has he no shame?

    I would think he’d shy away from the public eye (like Larry “wide stance” Craig), hoping and praying he will not be remembered as the man who crapped in adult diapers and had a prostitute change him.

    • infectious_d September 24th, 2014 at 9:31 am

      what he really needs is a hug…but he’s just too shy to ask Obama for one himself…he wants to be ‘proposed’ to so to speak

  10. searambler September 23rd, 2014 at 8:18 pm

    He needs a diaper on his head to catch that verbal diarrhea….

  11. infectious_d September 23rd, 2014 at 8:43 pm

    “woke up today, n’ just decided ‘hey lemme shout random crap in front of a camera again!’…i can get away with it by screamin’ ‘dementia!'” -trainwreck of thought

    • Anomaly 100 September 23rd, 2014 at 9:14 pm

      Hey stranger! I’ve missed you.

      • infectious_d September 24th, 2014 at 2:27 am

        and i you, as well, also :p

  12. Dammitjim September 23rd, 2014 at 9:10 pm

    Wait. Is Obama doing too much or not enough to deal with terror threats? I’m confus.
    So either the sky is falling or it’s not. Where do they find these people?!?

  13. William September 23rd, 2014 at 9:51 pm

    David Vitter and Larry Craig sponsored the marriage protection amendment.
    Comedy writers couldn’t dream up stuff this funny.

    • infectious_d September 24th, 2014 at 2:31 am

      lol for a second i read it as “a force that needs to be changed!” haha, though i suppose both work wonderfully

  14. juicyfruityyy September 24th, 2014 at 12:13 am

    it’s not President Obama’s word alone. The Iraq invasion has done more harm than good. The Bushy Administration left some serious damages and scars. Vitter, has no credibility, to stand in judgement, of what the President is trying to do

  15. Tom Ward September 24th, 2014 at 12:26 am

    He may be right. Why is it so hard to believe a politician would do something to help his own party? The Obama admin response to this whole issue has been overblown, starting with the response to the beheadings. I originally assumed it had something to do with Obama showing Russia/Putin that the US is still willing and able to intervene in a foreign country if necessary. But, perhaps it’s some combination of all 3 intentions?: Wanting to destroy ISIS, wanting to show Putin we are willing to intervene, wanting to get democrats elected.

    • majii September 24th, 2014 at 1:23 am

      I’ve been a democrat for over 40 years. One thing I’ve never done is vote for politicians based on sabre-rattling. I was hoping we wouldn’t intervene militarily in Syria and that we wouldn’t become more involved in Iraq than we already are. I don’t see this president’s recent decisions on Syria and Iraq as being a move to get dems to the polls in November but as having to make focused-decisions in an attempt to try to reset the balance of power in Syria and Iraq.

      In fact, I’m less likely to vote for a politician who is a war-monger.

      • Tom Ward September 24th, 2014 at 10:14 am

        As am I, though I’m an indep not a dem. I think most dems would agree with that sentiment, perhaps it is t repubs in swing states who are more likely to vote for a dem party more willing to war terrorists

    • greenfloyd September 24th, 2014 at 2:39 am

      I was also skeptical then, today, I learned about this Khorasan Group that apparently was our primary, though unstated, target yesterday…U.S. strikes Khorasan Group in Syria –

    • mary September 24th, 2014 at 7:11 pm

      My God–you are ignorant as a rock and proud of the fact.

    • mary September 24th, 2014 at 7:12 pm

      And may you have just a split second to mull that BS over– if there is any justice–and you end up at the next ground zero.

    • edmeyer_able September 24th, 2014 at 10:29 pm

      It was georgie that lied us into this fu(king mess to begin with.

  16. greenfloyd September 24th, 2014 at 2:05 am

    “What’s that smell?” But seriously, followed link to Right Wing Watch to CNN story that I’m still digesting yet seems to explain a lot about what motivates Obama. Today’s word is Khorasan.

  17. rg9rts September 24th, 2014 at 3:29 am

    Judge the comment by its source

  18. shirleythomas September 24th, 2014 at 4:26 pm

    oh the irony of a liar of the worst kin,, an adulterer calling someone else a liar

  19. mary September 24th, 2014 at 7:10 pm

    Anyone know if Vitter ever got cured of his STDs caught from all the ladies of the evening he picked up?