Idaho Republican: Do Away With All Marriage Licenses Since Gay Ones Are Illegal
[su_right_ad]Idaho Republican State Senator Steve Vick says all marriage licenses should be eliminated if gays can get them. He proclaimed, “If we’re not allowed to determine the standards for a marriage license, then maybe we should just not issue them.”
The senator says these are the kind of things states must consider since the will of the voters is being rejected in the federal courts.
“I believe the only way the Supreme Court will hear it is if a different circuit court rules differently. I haven’t seen that yet, but if another circuit ruled that a state could keep on their books a constitutional amendment or a statute that says marriage should be between one man and one woman, then I think the Supreme Court would have to hear it. Other than that, I think these rulings will probably stand,” said Vick, referring to the high court refusing to hear appeals from multiple states after judges struck down voter-approved constitutional amendments establishing traditional marriage as law.
[su_csky_ad]
Anomaly 100 October 24th, 2014 at 8:26 pm
Uhmmm….OK, that’s fine with me.
whatthe46 October 24th, 2014 at 8:46 pm
only if his is null and void.
Carla Akins October 24th, 2014 at 8:27 pm
Hell, that’s not even original. Some young asshat from Oklahoma tried that last year.
tiredoftea October 24th, 2014 at 8:34 pm
From the “the only good court is one that agrees with me” file.
tracey marie October 24th, 2014 at 8:47 pm
More babble. When laws are written that create benefits to married people then ALL married people will benefit
fancypants October 24th, 2014 at 8:48 pm
its almost as good as listening to Harley and walt
http://youtu.be/y-LAEhWZOKM
StoneyCurtisll October 24th, 2014 at 9:10 pm
What a freak show…:)
fancypants October 24th, 2014 at 9:15 pm
5 out of 5 *****
better then a scripted comedy show I was laughing through the entire debate and its a must watch if you have time.
Obewon October 24th, 2014 at 8:50 pm
If Iowa State Sinner (R-IA) Steve Vick were accurate he’d opine: ‘I believe the only way the Supreme Court will rehear equal marriage again is if we overturn the 14th Amendment.’ None of these clowns elevators goes to the top floor anymore.
tracey marie October 24th, 2014 at 9:02 pm
How can people hate others for who they love, how?
whatthe46 October 24th, 2014 at 10:02 pm
sad part is he wasn’t born that way. created and of course, he’s continuing the ignorance and hatered with his own off spring.
StoneyCurtisll October 24th, 2014 at 9:02 pm
I forgot Idaho was even a state..:)
This Idaho Republicans opinion is as meaningless as his state is to me..
searambler October 24th, 2014 at 9:05 pm
“If we’re not allowed to determine the standards for a marriage license, then maybe we should just not issue them.”
Waaaah! Waaaah! Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!
Obewon October 24th, 2014 at 9:21 pm
He thinks he’s an Iowa firestarter! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mPQFLGxM6xs
StoneyCurtisll October 24th, 2014 at 9:51 pm
Old folks…
Doing punk..
I love it~!
Guy Lauten October 24th, 2014 at 9:40 pm
“Gonna take my ball and go home….”
fancypants October 24th, 2014 at 10:06 pm
http://youtu.be/CQlPcwiruaY
the entire debate
Enjoy !
Tommy6860 October 24th, 2014 at 11:37 pm
Haters of this extent, take the adage “Cut one’s nose off…”, to new heights. The GOP sure loves promoting the freedom theme of ‘less government’, until it’s not the lesser government they get.
factswonthurtyou2 October 25th, 2014 at 7:27 am
Not for the same reasons as Vick, I do agree with the elimination of ‘marriage licences’ as they are an antique, needless form of control and ownership………
William October 25th, 2014 at 8:48 am
The Government should get out of the relationship business. Marriage is largely an emotional, spiritual thing. People should be recognized as individuals, not couples. What they do in their personal lives is none of uncle Sams business.
Carla Akins October 25th, 2014 at 9:28 am
Gee, that’s fine but currently, there are all kinds of legal and tax implications that would need to be addressed on the federal level.
Not_Phyllis October 25th, 2014 at 9:54 am
Umm…Can we get an editor? NOT Iowa! Sheesh…