November 16, 2014 7:00 pm -

[su_center_ad]Gun rights activists are promising a crowd of 5,000 or more armed activists to gather at the Washington state capital’s lawn to protest stricter laws about gun ownership laws that will go into effect after voters approved ballot initiative i594. The rally, scheduled for 11 a.m. Dec. 13 at the state Capitol, is being put together…


D.B. Hirsch
D.B. Hirsch is a political activist, news junkie, and retired ad copy writer and spin doctor. He lives in Brooklyn, New York.

31 responses to Thousands Of Washington State Gun Proponents Vow To Break The Law

  1. tiredoftea November 16th, 2014 at 7:10 pm

    What a friggin’ maroon! I hope that he and his buddy enjoy passing their pot luck “gunbo” back and forth until their fingers freeze.

  2. FrankenPC . November 16th, 2014 at 7:19 pm

    The real shame here is that there is no way to harness this political rage into a useful direction.

    • edmeyer_able November 16th, 2014 at 7:27 pm

      Yea cause voting is useless, RIGHT?

      • FrankenPC . November 16th, 2014 at 7:44 pm

        How do you mean?

        • edmeyer_able November 16th, 2014 at 8:25 pm

          Well maybe I misinterpeted your comment whose rage were you speaking of, are you talking about the 2A rage?

          • FrankenPC . November 16th, 2014 at 9:52 pm

            Guns rights protester rage. Huge mis-directed potential.

    • M D Reese November 16th, 2014 at 8:38 pm

      That’s because it’s powered by stupid and is incompatible with the grid…

      • FrankenPC . November 16th, 2014 at 9:53 pm

        Heh. They run at 2.5 phase. What? That’s crazy you say? Yes.

        • M D Reese November 16th, 2014 at 10:39 pm

          …and I’m pretty sure that their mothers never had them tested…

  3. mea_mark November 16th, 2014 at 7:20 pm

    They are scheduling it for mid-December because they no one is going to show-up and this way they will have an excuse as to why.

  4. whatthe46 November 16th, 2014 at 7:25 pm

    “these are law-abiding folks, they have a political statement,” Calkins said. “We don’t expect a huge problem.” but, call in the fk’n national guard for non-violent, non-gun carrying protestors in ferguson who are also making a political statement. kiss my brown a&&!

  5. edmeyer_able November 16th, 2014 at 7:25 pm

    And the police will see 5000 armed idiots breaking the law and deem it a peaceful protest.

    • mea_mark November 16th, 2014 at 7:39 pm

      If, and that is a big if, they actually show up. This all sounds like a stunt just to get some press coverage without actually doing anything. Kinda like that American spring or whatever it was that didn’t really happen.

      • Suzanne McFly November 16th, 2014 at 7:43 pm

        Yeah, I am betting 20 mama boys show up for a couple hours before they go back to their basements.

        • edmeyer_able November 16th, 2014 at 7:47 pm

          Not if they promise beer and bacon , they’ll be over whelmed…/s

      • M D Reese November 16th, 2014 at 8:37 pm

        Or the WBC. They just phone it in anymore I think.

  6. Suzanne McFly November 16th, 2014 at 7:42 pm

    What would these idiots do if the Ferguson protestors did this during their marches?

  7. Kick Frenzy November 16th, 2014 at 8:31 pm

    “Q – Can we open carry/don’t open carry/loaded carry?A. We’re not here to ask for our rights. We’re taking them. We are here to openly defy i594. We’re also here to be principled, respectful and peaceful. Don’t come looking for a fight, just come resolute. Bring your best, if that’s open carry, do it safe, if it’s concealed do so, if it’s your whole family, great. Come and stand principled for liberty and be a part of history.”

    Sure, open, closed… either is fine.
    Be good boys and girls!

    (Oh… and about the loaded carry… um… we’ll just plant our tongues in our cheeks and not specifically address that.)

  8. M D Reese November 16th, 2014 at 8:36 pm

    If these folks are strict constitutionalists, then they should join the effing army or reserves and register their guns.

    • KABoink_after_wingnut_hacker November 16th, 2014 at 8:41 pm

      Actually….their muskets…

      • M D Reese November 16th, 2014 at 8:46 pm

        True that. They were using muzzle-loaded guns back then.In for a penny, in for a pound.

    • tiredoftea November 16th, 2014 at 8:41 pm

      Or, read the Constitution, even.

  9. viva_democracy November 16th, 2014 at 8:54 pm

    Just like baggers. Cry States rights until the States pass laws they don’t like. Such whiny hypocrites.

    • christianh November 17th, 2014 at 10:45 pm

      I was hoping someone woudl say that… They are lawless period and even say so… And again there are no gun grabs, just a full background check system…

      Who knows how many illegal guns there actually are out there… Including unregistered and ones in the hands of people forbidden from having them…

      I believe there are 200K guns STOLEN every year so in 5 years, with a 10% recovery rate, that’s 800K illegal guns…


  10. viva_democracy November 16th, 2014 at 8:58 pm

    They had their chance. There were two initiatives on the WA ballot. One was for background checks (594) and the other was pro-NRA-against the background checks (591). The voters of WA State, myself included, voted FOR background checks.
    The people have spoken baggers now deal with it.

  11. Foundryman November 16th, 2014 at 10:08 pm

    If they do this, they should be arrested. They BETTER be arrested! They are not above the law just because they don’t agree with it.

    • DD November 17th, 2014 at 8:00 pm

      I agree completely!! No one is above the law. I am all for civil disobedience, but not with guns, loaded or not!!

  12. Robert Merrill Taylor November 17th, 2014 at 9:40 am

    I think that the Washington National Guard armed with flame throwers could provide sufficient heat of it is cold.

    • DD November 17th, 2014 at 7:59 pm

      Sorry, we don’t play the Ferguson bullshyt here in WA state. We are a progressive state. We will not follow Jim Crow like solutions.

  13. DD November 17th, 2014 at 7:57 pm

    He had two chances to make something happen this election cycle and he failed at both. What on this green earth says that he has the ability to pull this off. He is a loser on many fronts, this will be no different. As for the State Patrol that says they won’t be arresting anyone breaking the law, I say we need a new sheriff in town. The rest of us have to follow laws we don’t necessarily agree with, so do these numb nuts!!

  14. Matt Dillon November 18th, 2014 at 12:02 pm

    Anybody know how these loons will prove they got a background check to obtain their damned gun?