Phil Robertson Indicates Atheist Dad Would Be Fine With Rape Of Daughters
[su_right_ad]Duck Dynasty’s Phil Robertson has a very simple view of religion: If you have it, you believe in good. If you don’t, you won’t know right from wrong.
“I’ll make a bet with you,” Robertson said. “Two guys break into an atheist’s home. He has a little atheist wife and two little atheist daughters. Two guys break into his home and tie him up in a chair and gag him. And then they take his two daughters in front of him and rape both of them and then shoot them and they take his wife and then decapitate her head off in front of him. And then they can look at him and say, ‘Isn’t it great that I don’t have to worry about being judged? Isn’t it great that there’s nothing wrong with this? There’s no right or wrong, now is it dude?’”
Robertson kept going: “Then you take a sharp knife and take his manhood and hold it in front of him and say, ‘Wouldn’t it be something if this [sic] was something wrong with this? But you’re the one who says there is no God, there’s no right, there’s no wrong, so we’re just having fun. We’re sick in the head, have a nice day.’”
[su_center_ad]
Larry Schmitt March 24th, 2015 at 6:05 pm
“Decapitate her head off” If there were any doubt, he just proved what a complete moron he is. Hey Phil, being atheist doesn’t mean you have no morals. It means you don’t blame sh*t that happens on some magic sky daddy, and you don’t ask said magic sky daddy for favors. It means you take responsibility for your own actions, and when something goes wrong, you fix it. And how did these intruders find out you’re atheist in the first place? And most importantly, why am I arguing with a brain-dead a$$hat like this?
craig7120 March 24th, 2015 at 6:30 pm
Mr Robertson, Isis is looking for an inspirational speaker to bring up recruiting numbers.
What a creep
anothertoothpick March 24th, 2015 at 6:32 pm
He sounds an awful lot like Charlie Manson.
Have a nice day.
FatRat March 24th, 2015 at 6:37 pm
Atheist don’t break in to homes and attack other atheist, not a single reason to do so. So I’m assuming those two were Christian terrorist. Grab a shotgun and place some bear traps around the windows to keep your home safe from the marauding monotheist menace.
http://www-tc.pbs.org/wnet/religionandethics/files/2001/08/godsarmy-post09-knocking.jpg
https://liveraf.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/j.jpg
http://cp91279.biography.com/1000509261001/1000509261001_1892050825001_bio-top250-tedbundy-betrayal.jpg
Barry Shitpeas March 24th, 2015 at 6:44 pm
Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.
Lot 19:8
Larry Schmitt March 24th, 2015 at 6:49 pm
And that’s what you call good old biblical family values.
Barry Shitpeas March 24th, 2015 at 6:55 pm
Anyone who believes in invisible men and talking snakes should be ashamed of themselves.
Dwendt44 March 24th, 2015 at 7:22 pm
That and wondering just who Cain and Seth had sex with.
Larry Schmitt March 24th, 2015 at 7:24 pm
Right. Where did Adam and Eve’s grandchildren come from? Another rib?
FatRat March 24th, 2015 at 7:32 pm
Missing rib is actually the missing penis bone. Words got jumbled up other time. lol
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/discoblog/2011/08/19/ncbi-rofl-what-did-god-do-with-adams-penis-bone/#.VRHzF3b3-iw
Another genetic condition, extending to 100% of human males, is the congenital lack of a baculum. Whereas most mammals (including common species such as dogs and mice) and most other primates (excepting spider monkeys) have a penile bone, human males lack this bone and must rely on fluid hydraulics to maintain erections.
We think it is far more probable that it was Adam’s baculum that was removed in order to make Eve. That would explain why human males, of all the primates and most other mammals, did not have one. The Hebrew noun translated as “rib,” tzela (tzade, lamed, ayin), can indeed mean a costal rib. It can also mean the rib of a hill (2 Samuel 16:13), the side chambers (enclosing the temple like ribs, as in 1 Kings 6:5,6), or the supporting columns of trees, like cedars or firs, or the planks in buildings and doors (1 Kings 6:15,16). So the word could be used to indicate a structural support beam. Interestingly, Biblical Hebrew, unlike later rabbinic Hebrew, had no technical term for the penis and referred to it through many circumlocutions. When rendered into Greek, sometime in the second century BCE, the translators used the word pleura, which means “side,” and would connote a body rib (as the medical term pleura still does). This translation, enshrined in the Septuagint, the Greek Bible of the early church, fixed the meaning for most of western civilization, even though the Hebrew was not so specific.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORztFURoec0
I’m Gonna Git You Sucka: How Much for a Order of Ribs?
bluejayray March 24th, 2015 at 7:58 pm
Beat me to it.
Roctuna March 24th, 2015 at 6:47 pm
I know the answer to this question would fill a book, but the the hell is wrong with these people? If they’re not obsessing over gay sex they obsess over murder and torture. They’re sick, sick, sick.
wpadon March 24th, 2015 at 6:53 pm
If eternal damnation is the only reason you do not act out your fantasies, perhaps the problem is on your end. Why do you entertain such dark and bellicose thoughts?
William March 24th, 2015 at 6:59 pm
Ah yes. Duck Dynasty….The go to guys when I’m looking for wisdom.
Suzanne McFly March 24th, 2015 at 7:01 pm
Perfect pic to give a visual to the geniusness that is duck dynasty.
William March 24th, 2015 at 10:28 pm
Like ZZ top with lobotomies.
Suzanne McFly March 25th, 2015 at 6:33 am
and no talent either, shooting animals is not a talent.
Larry Schmitt March 24th, 2015 at 7:25 pm
Their IQ’s are written all over their faces.
bluejayray March 24th, 2015 at 7:57 pm
This is priceless, too:
http://www.today.com/popculture/beards-duck-dynasty-stars-are-unrecognizable-8C11411204
William March 24th, 2015 at 10:27 pm
LOL Thanks
Suzanne McFly March 24th, 2015 at 7:03 pm
Let me be thankful my brain isn’t consumed with thoughts like this jackwads.
Maxx44 March 24th, 2015 at 7:06 pm
The attackers don’t have to worry about being judged? So criminals can attack atheists and laws no longer apply? Can this bearded creep sunk any lower?
dave-dr-gonzo March 24th, 2015 at 7:14 pm
No. But then, his own words pretty much encapsulate the arrogance of the White Segregationist Evangelical… er, ahem, pardon me, the Born-Again Xtian movement. http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/02/26/3333161/religious-liberty-racist-anti-gay/
Dwendt44 March 24th, 2015 at 7:39 pm
You don’t need a god to be good.
Larry Schmitt March 24th, 2015 at 7:22 pm
This is connected to this issue. http://fox59.com/2015/03/24/religious-freedom-bill-passes-senate-now-awaits-gov-pences-signature/
Dwendt44 March 24th, 2015 at 7:25 pm
I wonder how he explains why christians, who make up 75% of the population, are 93% of prison inmates. Atheists, who are ~9+% of the population, represent way less than 1% of prisoners.(about 1/2 of 1%)
Larry Schmitt March 24th, 2015 at 7:27 pm
Maybe because atheists don’t have voices inside their heads telling them to do things.
Doug Bristow March 25th, 2015 at 12:41 am
They are called CINO’s.
Dwendt44 March 25th, 2015 at 12:43 am
A large portion of the radical right are that way.
Doug Bristow March 25th, 2015 at 12:47 am
A large portion of ALL are that way.
alvin March 25th, 2015 at 1:13 am
I am only speculating, but I suspect at least part of the reason Christians are over-represented in prison is religious conversion. Existential crises tend to heighten (some) people’s religiosity.
Warman1138 March 24th, 2015 at 7:59 pm
That’s some sick imagination from a genetically damaged demophobic.
tracey marie March 24th, 2015 at 8:04 pm
what a sicko, he needs to be put away in a hospital. what kind of person thinks up that scenario?
tracey marie March 24th, 2015 at 8:05 pm
what about priests and you, you said you like little girls
Budda March 24th, 2015 at 8:40 pm
What is wrong with this creep?
Hirightnow March 24th, 2015 at 9:20 pm
You know who else would be fine with the rape of his daughters?
Lot , a righteous man.
CarolO March 25th, 2015 at 8:44 pm
One of Robertsons buddies, Ted Nugent.
pignose4.0 March 24th, 2015 at 9:38 pm
Why are cons so infatuated with another mans penis is it penis envy nah they’re men or they pretend to be men but it seems like every conversation had with one off them ends up on the subject of a penis or an anus.
K. Martinez March 25th, 2015 at 12:47 am
He’s starting to look and sound a lot like ISIS. If you think we only have a problem with outsiders coming here, consider who is already here.
Steve c March 25th, 2015 at 1:15 am
what an ignorant douchebag. of course there is something wrong with this, whether you believe in god or not. he is mistaking being good with needing to be religious. why is it that all these morons always get press, and athiests like us dont feel the need to go and be heard. stop pushing your beliefs on people,like politics,keep it to yourself,between you and whatever god you like. (after all, who’s to say which one of them is correct,seeing as no ones ever seen them or has any proof of existance at all).
fahvel March 25th, 2015 at 5:32 am
please please please stop giving this piece of excrement any more space.
Suzanne McFly March 25th, 2015 at 11:43 am
How many times are we supposed to allow this cretin to show us how worthless and idiotic he is before we smarten up and learn to finally just ignore him?
Mr. Wizard March 25th, 2015 at 2:00 pm
Is he Charlie Manson’s long lost brother? Looks like him and he’s totally insane too!
Dwendt44 March 26th, 2015 at 12:57 am
He could pass for an ISIS warrior.
lissany March 25th, 2015 at 4:47 pm
On the contrary, atheists know what is right from wrong without having to be told by a deity under threat of eternal punishment or the promise of eternal reward.
Luciusleftfoot March 26th, 2015 at 10:46 am
Exactly! Doing the right thing should be done because it’s the right thing, not because you will be rewarded for doing it.
IamCaptain March 25th, 2015 at 4:54 pm
Everyone asking what’s wrong with him missed his title “Conservative”
Debora Elizabeth Hill March 25th, 2015 at 6:26 pm
Is it really possible to be as sick as this man, and not be in a padded room? I’m not sure if he’s taken too many drugs or he needs them…
Rhonda March 25th, 2015 at 7:11 pm
I think the point of what Phil Robertson said, and one that obviously sailed past most people reading this, is that the natural outcome of a naturalistic/humanistic pov is that if anything goes, then that atheist father shouldn’t be surprised at the inhumane treatment of himself and his family. Without God, who determines what is right or wrong? Sure you can *say* something is wrong, but without a standard, who is the final arbiter of what is good, evil, right or wrong? That was his point. You don’t have to agree with it, but whether you like it or not, there *is* a holy God who is both loving and just. *He* is the one who determines right and wrong, and it has nothing to do with how “nice” someone is. He is holy, we are not. He is the Creator, we are the created. He wrote the Story, we are simply living in its pages.
James King March 25th, 2015 at 7:30 pm
I understand that when I am cut, I bleed, and it hurts. And even though I have absolutely NO CLUE what others are actually feeling because I have no direct access to their nerves and spinal cord and brain, I believe that when they are cut, they are hurt, too.
Therefore, I choose to act in a certain way not because someone ordered me to do so, but because I don’t like it when I am hurt, and I suspect that others do not like it when they are hurt. So I do not knowingly hurt people. I would not knowingly kill or harm another person physically because such an action would make me feel upset, and I do not wish others to have that feeling.
That is empathy. It exists outside of religion. It requires no religion to understand or put into practice.
Now, there *are* mentally ill people who don’t have empathy for others, and those people definitely need something stronger than they are so they do not harm others, because they harm people for their own purposes without any regard to the other person’s feelings.
People like Phil seem to have empathy, but only for people who are within their own tribe. They have limited empathy. They would willingly harm or kill someone outside their own tribe, and might even be rewarded for doing so by the tribal members. That may not be mentally ill behavior, but it certainly is far more primitive and less advanced than someone who respects all human life.
Phil’s comments actually show me that he has less respect for human life than many atheists do, because Phil requires that you be a part of his tribe or you recognize his tribe’s superiority and are subservient to his tribe in order for him to respect you.
OldLefty March 25th, 2015 at 7:43 pm
Phil’s comments actually show me that he has less respect for human life than many atheists do, because Phil requires that you be a part of his tribe or you recognize his tribe’s superiority and are subservient to his tribe in order for him to respect you.
____________
Agreed.
Also seems like he needs carrots and sticks.
OldLefty March 25th, 2015 at 7:42 pm
I think the point of what Phil Robertson said, and one that obviously sailed past most people reading this, is that the natural outcome of a naturalistic/humanistic pov is that if anything goes, then that atheist father shouldn’t be surprised at
________
They say the same thing about religious people. People justify all sorts of evil with their religion.
“With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”
― Steven Weinberg
CarolO March 25th, 2015 at 8:37 pm
I am 72 years old and haven’t walked into a church in 50 years. I do not believe in killing, rape or committing any crime not because of God but because of ME. I have morals, a conscious and believe in being of good character. It took 1500 years to write the Bible and it was written by numerous people. WHO? No one even knows. But yet people beat their chests over what was written by unknown people. Phil Robertson should be telling people how he was nothing but a drunk, his wife left him and supported their kids and held a job while he lived in the bottom of a bottle for years
OldLefty March 25th, 2015 at 9:03 pm
CarolO, forgive my repetition, but your post inspired me to do it..
“With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion.”
― Steven Weinberg
CarolO March 26th, 2015 at 12:27 am
The problem with Robertson’s train of thought is that he believes HIS religion is the only way of thinking. He doesn’t consider the US is made up of many people with many religions……and some with no religion. But he would consider an Atheist anyone who doesn’t believe as he does.
tracey marie March 25th, 2015 at 11:12 pm
you are as sick and twistest as that piece of shit from reality TV
Dwendt44 March 26th, 2015 at 1:06 am
Is this the same god that endorses slavery, exemplified polygamy, supported child abuse, supports rape marriage, and advocated killing those that disagree with your beliefs?
No thanks, I’ll pass.
Charles Wallace March 25th, 2015 at 8:39 pm
Why does anyone listen to complete morons?
Foundryman March 25th, 2015 at 9:46 pm
Someone should follow the money to see who is financing this Robertson clan. These people are sick an dangerous.
tracey marie March 25th, 2015 at 11:15 pm
he owns a business and the discovery channel, they pay him and his klan to be rednecks
Luciusleftfoot March 26th, 2015 at 10:40 am
Duck Dynasty is on A&E, which is not part of Discovery Communications.
I know Discovery has their fair share of redneck reality tv, or “Poor-nography” as I call it, but let’s get the facts straight here.
tracey marie March 26th, 2015 at 11:44 am
My mistake, no need to be testy
Alexander Price March 26th, 2015 at 1:35 am
It deeply saddens me that there are people who say things like this. His analogy was over the top, graphic, and unnecessary. But while much of what he said was ludicrous – and if you can look past his violently bitter attitude – I believe he makes a good point on one level. If there is no God (or some other supernatural presence or being), there can’t be such a thing as objective morality. That is not to say, however, that Atheists have worse moral conduct than anyone who is religious. It’s just that to be Atheist and claim that you objectively know what is right or wrong is fallacious. Logically, morality cannot be subjective. if one person says “You are wrong, I am right.” and someone else counters that by saying it directly back to them, one can be right, both can be wrong, but they cannot logically both be right. If there is no supernatural presence governing the world, morality has to either be objective or non-existent. As far as the seemingly pervasive immoral actions of Christians are concerned, I would implore you to bear in mind that Christianity is the biggest religion in the world. Referring back to the fact that neither religious people nor Atheists have superior moral conduct, it makes perfect sense that you would see more Christians doing more harm than Atheists. But you also see more of them doing good. It’s all a numbers game. It’s just that the negative actions of Christians are highlighted more often. When Christians claim an identity of righteousness (which they aren’t supposed to do, but often do anyways), people watch them more closely and judge them more harshly. I worry when Christians say ignorant hateful things like this because they make the rest of us look bad and they end up creating division instead of unity. Thank you if you took the time to read this really long comment.