April 24, 2015 7:00 am -


Gun advocate Larry Pratt was responding to the vote to confirm Loretta Lynch as attorney general.

“I’ll give President Obama one thing,” Pratt said. “In all the appointments he’s made that I’m aware of, unlike Republican presidents who have appointed people because they played golf with them, or because somebody said something nice about them among the elite, President Obama has only appointed, to my knowledge, people who are willing to be as ruthless as is he. That explains Eric Holder. That explains Loretta Lynch, who is an Obama appointee as U.S. attorney in New York.”

When Schneider noted with scorn that “Lynch views voter ID laws as being racist,” Pratt said that opposition to such voting restrictions is part of Obama’s “ruthless” attempt to steal elections for Democrats, which will eventually lead to the Republican Party dying out.

“If they have to deal with photo voter ID, they lose, because it makes it much more difficult to steal elections,” he said. “And in all too many cases, the Democrats have been able to win only because of election fraud. And that’s why they are so bitterly resisting photo voter ID.




D.B. Hirsch
D.B. Hirsch is a political activist, news junkie, and retired ad copy writer and spin doctor. He lives in Brooklyn, New York.

27 responses to Pratt: Obama Only Nominates ‘Ruthless’ People To Steal Elections For Democrats

  1. Suzanne McFly April 24th, 2015 at 7:12 am

    “Lynch views voter ID laws as being racist,”

    The nerve, and I heard she thinks the sky is blue and the grass is green, what will happen to us in these last two years? OMG someone might have to answer for wrongs they committed. Agh, the horror!!!

    • Hirightnow April 24th, 2015 at 5:32 pm

      I’m still agog over the sentence “Lynch views voter ID laws as being racist,”….
      Is that irony,dichotomy, or what?

      • Suzanne McFly April 24th, 2015 at 8:12 pm

        I find it ironic myself.

    • Dwendt44 April 24th, 2015 at 6:28 pm

      There’s a rumor floating around that the earth isn’t flat.

  2. Hirightnow April 24th, 2015 at 7:46 am

    One word, jerkbag:

  3. NW10 April 24th, 2015 at 8:12 am

  4. Larry Schmitt April 24th, 2015 at 9:45 am

    “Democrats have been able to win only because of election fraud.” Prove it. Show me an election the Democrats stole with fraud that could be prevented with voter ID. You can’t, because it doesn’t exist.

    • Dwendt44 April 24th, 2015 at 6:29 pm

      A totally fair election will swing Democrat every time. All recent efforts like heavy handed redistricting, are targeted at stopping that.

  5. allison1050 April 24th, 2015 at 10:34 am


  6. arc99 April 24th, 2015 at 11:14 am

    Suppressing the vote and appealing to the worst instincts of its far right caucasian base were the stated goals of prominent conservatives who have shaped conservative thought in 21st century America.

    Paul Weyrich, a co founder of the Moral Majority stated very clearly that the conservative agenda is best served when as few people as possible vote.

    Before his death, GOP strategist Lee Atwater talked about the use of code words hiding behind fiscal policy in order to replace the now unacceptable n-word when discussing social issues in this country.

    I have provided links to both before, but maybe it is time to stop spoon feeding people. Voter id is the realization of the conservative dream of finding a way to reduce turnout especially among groups that vote primarily Democratic. Close polling places, reduce the availability of vote by mail, reduce the number of days when voting can occur and claim it is all about fiscal responsibility and the integrity of the electoral process.

    If any of you conservatives out there wonder why people like me are convinced that your agenda of voter id, whether you realize it or not, is a racist attempt to win elections by reducing turnout and appealing to the uglier instincts of conservative whites, it is because your f*cking leaders told us that was their strategy.

    Why is that concept so difficult for you to comprehend?

    • Gary Dean Musser Jr April 25th, 2015 at 6:34 pm

      democrats started and ran the KKK, democrats fought against civil rights, You need a id to drive, you need a id to buy alcohol, you need a id to buy a car, you need a id to rent or buy a house, you need a id to get a fishing license now since they want a id to vote all of a sudden it is racist? LOL you people get dumber by the second, it was the democrat leaders who said and I quote

      I’ll have those niggers voting Democratic for the next 200 years.” —Lyndon B. Johnson to two governors on Air Force One

      “These Negroes, they’re getting pretty uppity these days and that’s
      a problem for us since they’ve got something now they never had before,
      the political pull to back up their uppityness. Now we’ve got to do
      something about this, we’ve got to give them a little something, just
      enough to quiet them down, not enough to make a difference.”—LBJ
      ill-have-those-niggers-voting-democratic-for-the-next-200-years”— LBJ yup thats how the democrats think about them when there not around, you guys are just to stupid to accept it. Who were the first black people in congress? OH YEAH republicans but like i said the democratic leaders lie to you and you eat it up

      • arc99 April 25th, 2015 at 6:58 pm

        The LBJ quote is a never-substantiated 3rd hand account.

        What matters is that as President of the United States he did the right thing. And please spare me the history lesson. I am well aware of the nature of the Democratic party through the mid 1960’s when it was the more CONSERVATIVE of the two major parties. The more LIBERAL of the two parties has always been the ally of the civil rights movement. Nothing new there..

        The bottom line is I do not need to rely on hearsay and rumor to make my point.

        The comments of Paul Weyrich and Lee Atwater are well documented, and you clearly have no intelligent rebuttal other than nonsensical accusations about what I “eat up”

        So instead of irrelevant narratives about the Republican party of 100 years ago, how about a fact based rebuttal to the very real comments of a prominent GOP strategist.

        OH YEAH, that’s right, right wing apologists for the GOP never have any facts, only urban legends and folk tales about a Republican party that no longer exists.

        Unlike you, I back up what I say. here is the audio of Mr. Atwater. I await your reference to a similar recording of LBJ

        I may be dumb, but I am a heck of a lot smarter than people like you who would have us believe that the Republican party of the 19th century is somehow relevant to events in the 21st century.

        You start out in 1954 by saying, “N*gger,…..” By 1968 you can’t say “n*gger”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “N*gger, n*gger.”

      • OldLefty April 25th, 2015 at 7:01 pm

        Nice little binky for you guys;

        The Civil Rights
        Act of 1964;

        Total Votes;

        The House ;

        Southern Democrats: 7–87

        Southern Republicans: 0–10

        Northern Democrats: 145–9

        Northern Republicans: 138–24

        The Senate version:

        Southern Democrats: 1–20

        Southern Republicans: 0–1

        Northern Democrats: 45–1

        Northern Republicans: 27–5

        LBJ told Kennedy aide Ted Sorenson
        that “I know the risks are great and we might lose the South, but those
        sorts of states may be lost anyway.”

        Thenthe racist Democrats, (who were Democrats because the end of slavery damaged the economy of the south, and FDR’s policies did a lot to restore it), all became Republicans, the “Southern Strategy” was born and the South has been solidly Red ever since.

        I think if the civil
        Rights Act of 1964 came about now, it would fail because as EVERY Southerner of both parties voted against it, and and almost everyone
        else, of both parties voted FOR it, today, EVERY
        Southerner of both parties would vote against it and EVERY Republican would vote against it, in order to, as Voinovich said, “deprive the president of any bipartisan victory”.

        Meanwhile, the “Party of Lincoln” and union, has become the party of Lincoln’s assassin and secession.

        • arc99 April 25th, 2015 at 7:08 pm

          Those southern Democrats known as “Dixiecrats” who were the most conservative voting bloc in Congress, along with the people who voted for them, moved to the Republican party and became the “Reagan Democrats” right wingers love to boast about.

          Incredible how they use the actions of that group to disparage the modern Democratic party, while they simultaneously gush about how President Reagan appealed to those voters.

          par for the course from the low information American right wing.

          • OldLefty April 25th, 2015 at 7:13 pm

            Basically, they are the old confederacy.

  7. anothertoothpick April 24th, 2015 at 11:23 am

    Some Larry Pratt fans at a family picnic.

  8. rg9rts April 24th, 2015 at 11:36 am

    Steal elections like Bush…Twice??

  9. Foundryman April 24th, 2015 at 11:44 am

    This from the same person who once claimed the NRA was a liberal anti-gun organization.

  10. fahvel April 24th, 2015 at 11:52 am

    these people give ignorance an entire new meaning – wtf is wrong with these empty mindless fks?

  11. mfr4 April 24th, 2015 at 12:33 pm

    The republicans put people in positions of power because they golf or are nice to them. What about qualifications? Jesus H. Christ, we’re not talking about the PTA.

    • whatthe46 April 24th, 2015 at 1:47 pm

      and he actually said that. what a fk’n idiot.

    • Dwendt44 April 24th, 2015 at 6:24 pm

      No but that does explain George Bush and the boys.

  12. Dwendt44 April 24th, 2015 at 6:31 pm

    Synonyms of Prat:
    airhead, birdbrain, blockhead, bonehead, bubblehead, chowderhead, chucklehead, clodpoll (or clodpole), clot [British], cluck, clunk, cretin, cuddy (or cuddie) [British dialect], deadhead, dim bulb [slang], dimwit, dip, dodo, dolt, donkey, doofus [slang], dope, dork [slang], dullard, dumbbell, dumbhead, dum-dum, dummkopf, dummy, dunce, dunderhead, fathead, gander, golem, goof, goon, half-wit, hammerhead, hardhead, ignoramus, imbecile, jackass, know-nothing, knucklehead, lamebrain, loggerhead [chiefly dialect], loon, lump, lunkhead, meathead, mome [archaic], moron, mug [chiefly British], mutt, natural, nimrod [slang], nincompoop, ninny, ninnyhammer, nit [chiefly British], nitwit, noddy, noodle, numskull (or numbskull), oaf, pinhead, idiot [British], ratbag [chiefly Australian], saphead, schlub (also shlub) [slang], schnook [slang], simpleton, stock, stupe, stupid, thickhead, turkey, woodenhead, yahoo, yo-yo

    • Gary Dean Musser Jr April 25th, 2015 at 6:24 pm

      LOL dumbassocraps just hate the truth

  13. alpacadaddy April 24th, 2015 at 8:51 pm

    You Lie!