June 4, 2015 7:00 pm -


Sarah Palin never misses a chance to use someone else’s sorrow to bash liberals. In this case, it’s the Duggar family that she’s using to try to make the case that liberals are hypocrites.


She’s referring there to actress Lena Dunham, who wrote a passage in her book, about her sexual curiosity, involving her little sister that really set off the conservative blogosphere. Palin says liberals are hypocrites for not caring about that but “crucifying” the Duggars.

She even links to her own daughter Bristol‘s post on the issue, who wrote, “The double standards make me sick.”



D.B. Hirsch
D.B. Hirsch is a political activist, news junkie, and retired ad copy writer and spin doctor. He lives in Brooklyn, New York.

53 responses to Palin Uses Duggars To Attack Lena Dunham And Liberals

  1. BigDumbWhiteGuy June 4th, 2015 at 7:50 pm

    I suggest people go and read Bristol’s post. The acorn does not fall far from the tree.

    “But now their ENTIRE family is punished and their hit show is canceled? He’s labeled as a pedophile? His family is crucified!”
    Good lord.

    • Larry Schmitt June 4th, 2015 at 8:31 pm

      Some labels are accurate. A teenage boy who molests his younger sisters IS a pedophile.

    • Wee Mousie June 5th, 2015 at 12:38 pm

      Sorry, but an acorn is both tasty and nutritious.

      “The grizzly bear’s dropping don’t pile up far from its scratching post.”


  2. Jeb ==The Mexican Impregnator June 4th, 2015 at 9:15 pm

    Camel Toe looking for another book tour event.

  3. Mike June 4th, 2015 at 9:45 pm

    Is it me or does that read like a drunken rant…???

    • whatthe46 June 4th, 2015 at 10:01 pm

      doesn’t she always sound like a drunkard ranting?

      • Wee Mousie June 5th, 2015 at 12:30 pm

        To me she always sounds like a drunken Veg-O-Matic.

        • whatthe46 June 5th, 2015 at 7:22 pm

          don’t know what that sounds like, but i would imagine it making my damn ears bleed.

        • granpa.usthai June 7th, 2015 at 12:29 pm

          with lots of liquor inside!

  4. Chris June 4th, 2015 at 10:45 pm

    Her outrage is predictable and laughable. Especially the “shocking, unethical leak.” Sarah, how about how Jim Bob attempted to hide the matter for years, how he didn’t report it to authorities until the statute of limitations expired, and how the Huckabee appointed judge ordered the records destroyed.

    THAT is what is shocking and unethical. Hypocrite. We still don’t know what the full extent of the Duggar boy’s crimes were. And now we never will. Some justice.

    • whatthe46 June 4th, 2015 at 10:57 pm

      i’m sure there’s more. just like cosby, once that cat was out of the bag, women felt empowered and no longer alone. i’m just thinking it’s only a matter of time.

      • Hirightnow June 4th, 2015 at 11:25 pm

        This crap actually makes me have (comparatively) more respect for Cosby…

        • Wee Mousie June 5th, 2015 at 12:28 pm

          I wouldn’t call it respect, exactly. I merely acknowledge that Cosby has sufficient intellectual capacity to understand that there is no positive way to spin his problem. Silence is the best he can do.

  5. Obewon June 4th, 2015 at 10:51 pm

    Grifter Palin and her shallow end of the genepool Repubs defend incest child molesters because that’s their hillbilly way!

    • Hirightnow June 4th, 2015 at 11:23 pm

      Don’t you dare be talkin’ ’bout my wife-sister that way! Why, I’ve known my wife longer than you have yours…hell! I changed her diapers!”

  6. ExPFCWintergreen June 4th, 2015 at 11:50 pm

    Permanent Shorter Sarah Palin: “Hey, lookit! Lookit me! Lookit! I’m over here! Lookit! I’m still alive! Here! Over here! Lookit me!”

    • Larry Schmitt June 5th, 2015 at 7:37 am

      Of course, once everyone looks, they realize there’s nothing to see.

  7. robert June 5th, 2015 at 12:07 am

    very good sarah your only on facebook now

  8. William June 5th, 2015 at 2:10 am

    The only thing missing is a banjo.

    • Obewon June 5th, 2015 at 3:04 am

      Palinbrawl family values!

      • Larry Schmitt June 5th, 2015 at 7:50 am

        When she was giving the speech, she had notes written on her hands, including “Obama sucks” and “Norwegians = Dutch sorta.” Pretty funny. They understand her pretty well.

      • Wee Mousie June 5th, 2015 at 12:46 pm

        This video suffers from quite a dip into the uncanny valley, but then, so do the Palins.

      • Wee Mousie June 5th, 2015 at 12:46 pm

        This video suffers from quite a dip into the uncanny valley, but then, so do the Palins.

      • granpa.usthai June 7th, 2015 at 12:11 pm

        those funnie Taiwanese always overemphasize women’s breast.
        (take out the mega roll of Alaskan Charmin and whatcha got left?)

    • fahvel June 5th, 2015 at 3:10 am

      believe me W, it’s there in the background.

      • granpa.usthai June 7th, 2015 at 11:31 am


        I can see the reflections of a banjo in her glasses.

        plus! (note the Perv’s position of the right hand!)
        most ‘non-pro’ women would be offended, but then, most ‘non pro’ women don’t use a mega roll of Charmin.


    • Bunya June 7th, 2015 at 4:28 pm

      LOL! How does one go about becoming a born again virgin? Is it the same for pedophiles wherein “God forgives them” so they immediately become non-pedophiles? What becomes of children born to the born again virgin? Do they automatically become products of an immaculate conception?

  9. labman57 June 5th, 2015 at 9:31 am

    Palin has finally completed her transformation from a political wannabe of limited intellect to a bitter, moronic old crone with vitriol flowing in her veins.

    • granpa.usthai June 7th, 2015 at 11:24 am

      she’s a burned out 51+year old half term LOSER that dresses like a whore.

      with a horrid DU wig.

  10. Mike Mastela June 5th, 2015 at 12:17 pm

    She’s so irrelevant, who really cares and why does the media give her the publicity she so desperately seeks?

  11. Robert Kennedy June 5th, 2015 at 1:01 pm

    So Bristol inherited her mother’s intelligence? How droll.

  12. Guy Lauten June 5th, 2015 at 1:53 pm

    Sarah specifically calls Lena a “pedophile”. I hope she has direct evidence of such, otherwise that’s called slander. Slander can cost people a whole lot of money, specially if the one being slandered doesn’t care how much she spends to press the case. Popcorn anyone?

    • UnknownUzer June 5th, 2015 at 8:18 pm

      Liberals have used the term pedophile to describe the Duggar kid all week in response to news that he felt their boobs through their clothes a decade and a half ago, yet those same liberals call it innocent curiosity when fellow liberal Lena Dunham brags about pacifying her baby sister with candy so she can shove her tongue in her vagina.
      Not to mention giving Roman Polanski a pass for drugging and anal rapping a minor child, saying that at least it “wasn’t rape rape”. Then there is ol’ slick willy Clinton himself, who forcefully raped scores of women who worked under him, only to have liberals victim blame and form a protection circle around their rapist in chief.
      I could write a novel of liberal pedophiles and rapists, but you know their names, you just choose to turn a shoulder of indifference to predators that share your same political/social agenda.

      • Hirightnow June 5th, 2015 at 9:08 pm

        Really? With their clothes on? So you were there?
        As for Lena Dunham, She kissed her sister on the lips when she was 7, and did some looking, to boot. Hardly pedophilia.
        I know of no liberal who gives Polanski a pass, and he’s spent time incarcerated for this, but here’s a quote from a story about Samantha Geimer in McPaper:

        Over the decades, she has seen public response to her own story change
        with the times. “You’ll notice the culture has shifted so that
        everything has swung the other way and now it’s Roman the Monster. And
        then it was my mum and I the monsters.” They were called liars and
        gold-diggers. Gore Vidal called her a hooker. “It was terrible and
        unwarranted, but not shocking. Well, some of it was shocking.” It was
        also a long time ago. Polanski should be allowed to resolve his legal
        issues and come back to the US, she says. “Because that’s what would be
        fair. Because it’s the right thing.” And her? She smiles. “I’m fine.”

        Clinton raped women? Funny that no charges have been filed. Adult women who choose to have sex with powerful men usually don’t consider it rape, but even if they did, there’s been ample time to file those charges.
        You have nothing but “Lookit these libruls! Lookit ’em!!!”.
        And it’s nowhere near enough to excuse the actions of a teenaged boy who fondles a four-year-old, or any of his other victims.
        (Before you spout off about how his sisters have forgiven him, tell me wether Samantha Geimer has over-controlling parents with an interest in hushing this up.)

        • UnknownUzer June 5th, 2015 at 10:45 pm

          Again you protect the liberal rapists.
          First, Dunham’s sister is SIX years younger than her, and according to her bragging of the assault her sister was not an infant so Dunham was much older than 7,and she herself has admitted to spreading her sisters legs/vagina, and sticking her tongue in her sisters vagina as she was pacified with candy. so your information is wrong.
          Funny that you use
          Polanski’s victims words to absolve the ADULT Polanski of his crime, yet your fellow liberals call the same forgiveness of the Duggar kid by his victims “brain washing”.
          What Polanksi has is the full support of Hollywood liberals who still clamor to work with him and to consume his product, and has worked aggressively to defend his crime.
          As far as Clinton is concerned,we all know that the Clinton’s are not strangers to using power and influence to silence controversy.

          • Hirightnow June 6th, 2015 at 7:17 am


          • granpa.usthai June 7th, 2015 at 11:21 am


          • tracey marie June 7th, 2015 at 11:32 am

            you lie

          • UnknownUzer June 7th, 2015 at 11:50 am

            It all factual history, and in the case of Dunham it is recorded in her own words and in her own book.
            Every time one of you losers buy her book she makes profit off of molesting her sister.

          • tracey marie June 7th, 2015 at 11:51 am

            you lie and troll

          • UnknownUzer June 7th, 2015 at 11:54 am

            And you support child molestation.

          • Obewon June 7th, 2015 at 12:16 pm

            Buh-Bye now. Falsely projecting the plethora of repubs Hastert, Dugar, Larry Craig & Tom Foley GOPedophilia problems onto others got you banned.

          • mea_mark June 7th, 2015 at 12:19 pm

            I was going to give them a few more minutes but …

          • jasperjava June 7th, 2015 at 12:18 pm

            Sounds like YOU’RE the one making excuses for child molesters, as long as they’re right-wing Aryan “Christian” Nazis like yourself.

          • granpa.usthai June 7th, 2015 at 12:21 pm

            deere mystery muck.
            I don’t think tracey marie or most other LL citizens are supporting the perverted acts of Josh Duggar or his parental/religious support of him using his sisters for perverted sexual pleasure. Please try to make your point without accusing LL citizens of Duggar/church family values. For one, it’s not true plus it also makes you sound as stupid as Sara.

      • burqa June 5th, 2015 at 9:27 pm

        I’m a liberal and I haven’t given any of them a pass.
        The Clinton sexual assault allegations were investigated and the GOP-appointed investigator came up with a 5-gallon bucket of squadoosh.
        I look forward to your comments in the Hastert threads.
        You’re not going to give him a pass, are you?

        • granpa.usthai June 7th, 2015 at 11:13 am

          might have something on the Clinton’s, burqa.
          that’s damn near the same thing the speaker of the house was saying during the impeachment statements.
          Don’t remember for sure if Newton was in the middle of his 3rd or 4th ADULTEROUS affair at the time, but the ‘immoral’ character thing hits a memory tone.

      • granpa.usthai June 7th, 2015 at 11:20 am

        you gonna run the WHITE church going republicon males on their ‘high family moral values’ gimmick again?

        tee hee hee


        be sure to wear your Sanford Argentina Tail Hiking rubbers
        (the above the nose ones)



        • UnknownUzer June 7th, 2015 at 11:39 am

          You’ll notice, I have not once defended the Duggar kid, only pointed out the hypocrisy of the liberal response to such acts based on the social/political leanings of not only the predator, but of the victims as well.
          If this had been a liberal minded celebrity, all of you would not only be calling it a case of simple childhood sexual exploration , such as you have done with Lena Dunham, but you would have kept the details under wraps to protect the rights of the victims.
          However, considering that the victims in this case happen to be members of the same conservative family, they are fair game and their rights as victims to not be exposed to public scrutiny is null and void.

      • tracey marie June 7th, 2015 at 11:31 am

        You really do embellish and outright lie when trolling.

        • UnknownUzer June 7th, 2015 at 11:47 am

          I’m not the one making a child touching a boob of another child through the clothes out to be some sort of violent sexual assault, while simultaneously defending a grown man drugging and anal rapping a child on a pool table as forgivable because it, to quote Whoopi Goldberg “wasn’t rape rape”. That is the role of the modern liberal. It’s good to know that if you want to get your rape on, and have it accepted by liberals, One should either do it in the butt cause that don’t count, or if possible make it lesbian pedophilia because that somehow seems less wrong, and above all have your DNC club card on hand.

          • mea_mark June 7th, 2015 at 12:11 pm

            All these people that you came are liberals that did bad things, how many of them claimed in the media to be moral models for the community at large? I don’t see near the hypocrisy on the left as I do on the right. Perhaps you are just missing that because you want to. Willful ignorance is a thing for some. Is it for you?

  13. burqa June 5th, 2015 at 9:24 pm

    Bristol is fortunate she did not have her child in the late 80s – early 90s.
    Back then, conservatives delighted in using the word “bastaard” and denying single mothers assistance was a major issue for them. They directed quite a bit of anger and finger-pointing toward young, single mothers.